Alexey Aleshchev vs Joris Hoogland Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Sep at 02:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Aleshchev vs J. Hoogland

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Aleshchev 1 - 0 Hoogland
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alexey Aleshchev winning 2 and Joris Hoogland winning 0. The last match between Alexey Aleshchev and Joris Hoogland was at the M25 Bali, 09-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Alexey Aleshchev getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Aleshchev | 1 |
Hoogland | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Bali(09-09-25)
A. Aleshchev vs J. Hoogland H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
48.98% (120-125) | Career Total W/L | 33.64% (37-73) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Aleshchev vs J. Hoogland Match Preview:
- When it comes to recent performances on second serves, Aleshchev has an edge, winning 40.53% of points compared to Hoogland’s 36.95%. Could this serve advantage be crucial?
- In terms of winning second serve return points, Aleshchev shows superiority with 49.42% compared to Hoogland's 35.67%.
- For first serve returns, Aleshchev again leads, capturing 29.56% of points over Hoogland’s 25.25%.
- Under pressure, Hoogland seems slightly better at saving breakpoints, with a 55.56% save rate versus Aleshchev’s 50%.
- Overall match performance in the past year favors Aleshchev, who has a win rate of 57.41%, while Hoogland’s stands at 45.45%.
- Both players excel on hard courts, with Aleshchev having a marginally better career win rate of 54% compared to Hoogland's 49%.
- Regarding match experience, Aleshchev and Hoogland have both mostly played at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level in the past year, but Aleshchev’s win rate is higher.
- Aleshchev faces slightly tougher competition on average, with opponents ranked 117.35, compared to Hoogland's 119.45. Does this quality of opposition help prepare Aleshchev for tougher matches?
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Aleshchev has a better chance, winning 38% of these sets, while Hoogland’s win rate is just 25%.
- When converting breakpoints, Aleshchev shows more efficiency with a 35.04% conversion rate, versus Hoogland’s 22.73%.
Editorial Prediction (September 8, 2025, UTC):
Examining the recent performance statistics reveals several notable aspects that may influence the outcome of the upcoming match. Aleshchev demonstrates stronger performance in key areas, including second serve success and return game efficiency.
Hoogland’s ability to save breakpoints could provide a slight buffer under pressure, yet Aleshchev's overall consistency and higher match-winning percentage present a formidable challenge.
The past records on hard surfaces favor Aleshchev slightly, hinting that the match could heavily favor them, especially given their superior breakpoint conversion rate and recent form.
Considering these elements, along with Aleshchev's stronger performance against higher-ranked competitors, it seems likely that Aleshchev will emerge victorious in this encounter.
Alexey Aleshchev vs Joris Hoogland Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Aleshchev vs J. Hoogland H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 2 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:21:37 | Average Match Time | 1:21:37 |
60% (27/45) | 1st Serve % | 54% (22/41) |
78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (11/22) |
44% (8/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 16% (3/19) |
60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
66% (27/41) | Return Points Win % | 36% (16/45) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Aleshchev Recent Matches Played
J. Hoogland Recent Matches Played

A. Aleshchev vs J. Hoogland Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
48.98% (120/125) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.64% (37/73) |
50.00% (270/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 35.04% (82/152) |
50.42% (2478/2437) | Games Win/Loss | 44.41% (977/1223) |
53.95% (82/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.33% (29/31) |
40.54% (30/44) | Clay Win/Loss | 15.22% (7/39) |
42.11% (8/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
208 | Aces Total | 82 |
0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
331 | Total Double Faults | 118 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
218.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 133.76 |
59% (3372/5762) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1341/2126) |
63% (2109/3372) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (857/1341) |
41% (984/2390) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (335/785) |
42% (230/545) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (74/165) |
39% (2174/5526) | Return Points Win % | 38% (785/2047) |
48.98% (120/125) | Futures W/L | 33.64% (37/73) |
49% (118/240) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (35/108) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
45% (20/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (8/18) |
41% (20/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (6/17) |
89% (122/108) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (35/31) |
11% (122/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (35/4) |
10% (123/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (74/5) |